RSS

Category Archives: Social Media

A Rebuke of Twifficiency

Unless you’ve been asleep under a stone for the past 48 hours you couldn’t have failed to notice the Twitter phenomenon that is Twifficiency. Created by James Cunningham it generated an efficiency score based on your Twitter usage. In order to access the service, though, you had to grant the application access to your Twitter account.

Unwittingly, or not, James had violated one of Twitter’s codes of practice re: abuse of privileged access to accounts. Specifically, the application automatically tweeted a message from the user’s account in the format:

My Twifficiency score is x%. What’s yours? http://twifficiency.com

Generally, this annoyed people but, because of its viral nature, the term “Twifficiency” started trending worldwide.

Now, can we please get some perspective on this?

Yes, it trended. Yes, it spread like wildfire. Yes, everyone’s talking about it; but so what? This is the Twitter version of “Britain’s Got Talented X-Factor for me Nan“. It was hugely popular but, ultimately, worthless. Shouldn’t we be discouraging this kind of sensationalism and, instead, be encouraging the trending of remarkable products (to quote Seth Godin). The mere fact that it trended says nothing about its worth – because it trended itself automatically, virally. This is the complete opposite of something that trends because users want to tell their friends about it. In fact self-promotion obfuscates this valuable measure.

James is, undoubtedly, a very nice chap who was just experimenting with an idea, but for some people to be considering offering him a job! Seriously, no. Stop.

Tech Crunch hits the nail on the head in their blog post and I would like to add to that by pointing out that Stephen Fry only scored 3%!!!

Now, if James had created the site with an opt-in option for re-tweeting (as opposed to its new opt-out option) and it had still trended; then, wow! That would have been a truly remarkable feat. The fact is, though, that you’ve removed any meaningful way of measuring your success.

I have no doubt that James will go on to great things but, I’m afraid, I think he should be infamous, not famous, for Twifficiency.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 18, 2010 in Social Media

 

Tags: ,

I’ve been scammed! A follow-up to Twitter Auth Issues

This is a follow-up post to Social Network Authorisation Needs to Change.

Having written the above post over a month ago and considering myself to be quite net-savvy, I’m hugely embarrassed and mortified to admit that I’ve just been victim to a Twitter-related scam. This is the scam site that duped me: http://www.ipadappstesting.com/. It’s safe to browse to it – JUST DON’T LOG IN!

I received a Twitter Direct Message (DM) from a trusted friend that invited me to go to the site so that I could sign up to be an iPad tester. At the end of the test period I would get to keep the hardware. Superb! Yeh, right.

My spidey-senses were working well enough that I didn’t complete the in-depth financial survey they put in front of me. What did happen, however, was their servers sent DMs to, presumably ALL, my friends inviting them to do the same. Needless to say that this was without my knowledge – let alone my consent.

Twitter, seriously guys, this needs to change quickly otherwise you’re going to go the way of Facebook.

The access granted to my account for an application needs to be segmented and I need to have the ability to REVOKE any aspect I’m not entire happy with at login time. For instance, the shill application in question should have had to request DM read / write access during their registration with Twitter. This should then have appeared as a checkbox on the Twitter OAuth screen. I would then have unchecked it.

Feeling rather violated now but, hey, how was I to know? I currently just have to put my trust in the application developers and I don’t think that’s either fair or sustainable.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 11, 2010 in Social Media

 

Tags: , ,

Social Network Authorisation Needs to Change

A few weeks ago I took a look at a website that needed my twitter login to work. The nature of the site was overtly read-only so I was happy to grant it access via twitter‘s OAuth process. Yesterday I took another exploratory look at a Facebook application which requested access to my account. Again, the nature of this application was completely read-only. Both apps were mildly interesting and I’d achieved what I’d set out to do. Done.

Imagine my [surprise | outrage | fury] (you choose!) when I discovered that both apps had posted public comments from my account. WTF!? Both used the familiar template of ‘I have just used [appX] to do [functionY]. Go to [urlA] to try it yourself.’.

OK, so nothing malicious in that – but I didn’t authorise either of these posts. Facebook does give you the ability to deny an application from posting in your name, but only after you’ve installed it. If the app posts immediately there’s nothing you can do about it.

Now, don’t get me wrong, good applications deserve to be blown along on the virtual word-of-mouth jet stream; but, and here’s the critical bit:

“It should be my decision to publicise my usage of your site.”

At TweetPivot we made a very conscious decision to enable a user to promote our site easily but not to presume that that’s what they wanted. If the site’s good enough they will, but automatically doing it for them removes any worth from the act.

So, what should happen now?

Well, you have to apply to Twitter if you want your application to be able to use their OAuth process. At that point you are asked whether your application requires read-only or read-write access to users’ accounts. When I enter my details into the popup OAuth window I want to be told whether I’m giving write rights to the app and, if that’s not acceptable to me, I want to be able to decline that ‘write’ request. If you want me to try out an application that I know has no reason to write to my account then I need confirmation that you can’t.

I would hate to see the Twitter authentication process get as complicated as Facebook’s became; but it does need improving. The API that all 3rd-parties hook into has very specific, well defined methods. Developers should have to declare, individually, which ones they need to invoke. For instance, if I gave you read-only access to my account how can I be sure that you haven’t just farmed off all my private Direct Messages?

Ultimately, this is going to be bad news for application developers that require integration to social networks. The next time I’m asked to try something like this I might hesitate. The time after that I might decline. Good developers are going to be punished and their great apps ignored by the unacceptable actions of the few.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 6, 2010 in Social Media

 

Tags: , ,